FG-0603 Contributor Review Period
Description
Require new contributors (human or AI) to operate under enhanced review for a defined period before granting full autonomy. The Review Period exists for calibration. New contributors need time to learn project conventions, and the team needs time to assess the contributor's quality, reliability, and alignment with project standards. The review period formalizes this mutual calibration.
Implementation
Define a review period length (1-4 weeks recommended). During this period, all contributions undergo enhanced review. Define clear graduation criteria: consistency with project standards, zero critical issues, demonstrated understanding of governance. Communicate the process transparently: this is calibration, not probation.
Success Indicators
- New contributors produce higher-quality work after the review period
- The team identifies and addresses contributor-specific issues early
- Graduation criteria are clear and objective
- Contributors view the period as supportive, not punitive
Failure Modes
- Review period too long: contributor fatigue before graduation
- Review period too short: issues not identified before autonomy is granted
- No graduation criteria: review period becomes indefinite
- Review without feedback: finding issues but not helping the contributor improve